|

![]() Chipco Web Site
|
The following is a compilation of e-mail messages sent to the Chipco
mailing list by Chip Harrison, of Chipco, Inc. It describes the proposed
changes to Le Petit Empereur, Chipco's excellent Napoleanic miniature
wargame.
Organization:
One stand in the expanded game equals two companies of foot (or the old
fashioned "division"). One battalion is four bases, three of LN, one of ET.
This gives an 8 company battalion. Not always the right number for each army,
but given the fact that companies were rarely at full strength, it is, I
think, a reasonable abstraction especially given the fact that you get a real
square out of four square bases. The ET base contains one line company and the
grenadier company. To deploy LT units, mark the unit of LN they are coming out
of and deploy a LT base in front of the on line battalion or attack column as
appropriate. For "ordre mixte" use two battalions on line with a battalion in
column (in the French case attack column) on either end. LT troops will block
line of sight for shooting, probably using the new line of sight rules or a
modification of them.
Ranged Fire:
There will be shooting, but damage will be cumulative with no rallies, though
I have a neat idea in mind for reinforcements. Each regiment will have a
commander as will divisions and corps. These will be used to facilitate
movement, which will be governed by the morale clock, but in a different
manner.
Let's see, every unit has firing ability at rough equivalence, except Brits
(who are better at it in their two line formation) and Russians (who are worse
at it due to their penchant for the 'cold steel' of bayonets). These are both
compensated for in melee as you'll see.
LT troops (tirrailleurs) may either fire en masse or 'snipe' at enemy leaders.
They change facing for free, move through terrain at no movement cost, and can
quickly be re-integrated into their respective battalions. French and British
get some sort of elite light troops that can form unit base squares and have a
greater influence on the battle. LT troops other than these elites are
dispersed on contact with cavalry.
For artillery, I think I'll ignore battalion guns as they are small and few in
number. Their effect should be integrated into normal firing, I think. I'm
more interested in 'grand batteries' and horse artillery so the ART and LTA
types will probably still apply.
Morale Clock:
My thoughts on the morale clock are leaning toward it determining the number
of units and groups without a leader that can be moved in a phase. Since the
scope of the game is broad, changing the clock every turn should work better
when more than a division is involved on both sides.
Focus:
Robin asked what the focus is. I think I'd like to have the battalion of four
bases be the fundamental building block for armies, so that one could
conceivably scale the game from regimental actions to full armies on each
side. In big battles, I think command of a corps would be my goal for
individual players as this gives enough combined arms action to be fun, but
not unmanageable.
Melee:
Melee would be unit against unit, with d6 rolls + the number of ranks. So, for
instance, the Brits would add 2 while most other european nations would add 3.
If there is a 'destroyed outright' roll it should only happen in extreme
cases. Most of the time I'd like to see units get whittled down, reinforced,
whittled down, and so forth until the point of collapse. For example:
A1 A2
A3A4A5A6
B1B2B3B4
B5 B6
Infantry lines A3 - A6 and B1 - B4 are locked in close combat. As A3 takes losses (it would have three possible prior to destruction), A1 can move the loss counters onto itself. This shows that A1 has reinforced A3. As you can tell, A1 could cease to be in this way without combat simply by having its constituents parceled out. Cavalry:
C1A2
A1B1B2
B3B4A3
A4
Battalion B1 - B4 has formed square. Cavalry group A1 - A4 is attacking the
corners of the square. In the upper left A1/A2 have horse artillery unit C1 in
support (the square is clearly in trouble!).
My question is: Assuming we have a battalion square, what is the equivalent
cavalry unit size to have four bases and fit the above scenario?
C1 gives big bonuses to the cavalry; otherwise, depending on the level of the
morale clock, the square will be tough to crack. Forming square will depend on
the morale clock as a leader or a morale clock point will be necessary for its
execution.
The square (spoken as in Monty Python - "The Larch"):
Consider the Regiment AB as below:
A1A2A3A4B1B2B3B4 Battalions A and B may form square in the following way at a cost of their entire movement for the phase:
A2A3 B2B3
A1A4 B1B4
Note that A1A4 and B1B4 will be facing in the opposite direction from A2A3 and
B2B3 when the formation change is complete.
Regiment AB can form square using the battalion squares above as their first
move. After that, at a cost of their entire movement for the phase, they may
form any of these three regimental squares:
A2A3B2B3 B2B3 A2A3
A1A4B1B4 B1B4 A1A4
A2A3 B2B3
A1A4 B1B4
Forming up damaged battalion squares:
Assume A4 has been destroyed, but the
battalion wishes to form square. Its easy to do, really. Count up the ranks
still existing in the battalion as a whole. Now form the square as outlined
above by adding back in a "new" A4. Then distribute damage markers among all
four units until the battalion has the same number of existing ranks as
before. Note that this means a battalion must have at least 4 remaining ranks
in order to form square.
Movement:
I think we'll keep the 4" for infantry and 8" for cavalry movement
rates of LPE.
Firing:
ETs and Brits have a range of fifteen inches. All others have a range
of 10 inches.
What should artillery's range be? Base your thoughts on the number of times an
artillery unit should reasonably expect to fire at cavalry prior to being
contacted by them. Also, units targeted by 12 pounders will have to make a
morale roll of some sort. Counter battery fire is still prohibited except in
the case of "grand batteries". I will also probably give one LTA per Bn as
Battalion artillery (I changed my mind) and will add horse artillery as a
category.
Cavalry:
I'm thinking that each unit base will be a company with two being a
squadron.
Any cavalry with attached artillery does not suffer the usual -2 penalty when
fighting infantry prior to the morale clock reaching 4.
Playtest Scenario
The "official" playtest scenario suggestion is Elchingen, 1805. Hills, rivers,
bridges, 32 half strength Austrian infantry battalions against 16 full
strength French, some cavalry, some guns, very well documented (Scott Bowden's
"The Glory Years" will be the bible). A nice, even, and interesting fight that
will hopefully tax both commanders. Any thoughts?
Email Chip with any thoughts or suggestions on this scenario or any playtest rules.
|