|
Looking for trouble…
by GM Alex Khalifman
Now we know it for sure: Kasparov unpacked his SuperComputer. Another FRITZ-Dokhoian opening brilliancy gives him the lead in Linares.
|
The whole opening line ( 6.Be3 Ng4 in Najdorf ) became rather popular during the last years. 10.Qd2, however, is in my opinion inferior to 10.Be2 when White is aiming for more concrete play. Kasparov won against Shirov in Hoogovens 99 with 10…h5 11.Bxg4 hxg4 12.0-0 e6!? but it's another story. Also 12.a4 ( instead of 12.f3 ) deserved attention but Vassily was aiming for position from the game Anand - Kasparov ( Linares 1998 ). So naive! One year before Kasparov played passive move 14…Bd7 and got into worse position. Afterwards FRITZ & Dokhoian device was switched on and brand-new conceipt with 14…b4 was worked out. Looks so natural, doesn't it? The problem is that WC Council Champion can't even claim "the best novelty" as the move 14…b4! was already played in October 1998 by 11 years old Georgian girl Nana Dzagnidze during U12 girls' World Championship in Spain. Somehow her opponent ( also 11 years old girl, certainly) reacted better than superGM Vassily Ivanchuk. She retreated her knight to e2 so the real novelty in Ivanchuk-Kasparov game was played by Ivanchuk, and hardly successful. After 15.Nd1 Nxd4 16.Bxd4 d5! Black is doing really fine. 17.Ba7 would be lesser evil from Ivanchuk's point of view but caught by surprise he went astray and played the second part of the game obviously depressed. Somehow I've got a strong feeling that Kasparov started playing chess around move 23 and played the final phase quite well. Exchange sac is quite nice although obvious. It's a pity that he missed direct win with 28…Nxd1! and preferred to transpose the game into technically won ending. Ivanchuk was so shocked that he resigned in position where he could hang on for a while. Poor Vassily! I think he prepared some improvement to abovementioned Anand-Kasparov game. We will never know exactly which one. But anyway this severe punishment was well-deserved. So long when people will play Kasparov this way (I mean sharp theoretical lines even with some prepared novelties) he will win all the tournaments. I wrote about this in tournament preview. Unfortunately our website is not very popular yet. One can't win the race on "Volkswagen" vs. Formula car even being born-driver . Imagine: how many men and computers are working for Ivanchuk on his opening lines just every day and every night? And for Kasparov? So, Vassily, taste this bitter difference. Why wasn't he so aggressive the day before against Anand? Why didn't he play somewhat supersolid and boring (1.e4 c5 2.d3 or somewhat even more obscure) against Gazza? This man is champion - just let him show how good is he. No way. Playing Kasparov everybody concentrates all the aggression, chooses the sharpest opening line and… commits suicide this way. I can understand that all what Kasparov has done to destroy the chess world can cause such a reaction but please, a bit more quiet. Really I want to see Morozevich playing Kasparov. I bet he wouldn't challenge the champion in opening preparation. I hope he would choose the right way. |
Ivanchuk-Kasparov
after 14.Nd4 (14…b4!)
after 28.Kg1 (28…Nxd1!) Kasparov played 28…Rc8 and won anyway
|
(8) Ivanchuk,V (2714) - Kasparov,G (2812) [B90]
Linares (2), 22.02.1999
|
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Be3 Ng4 7.Bg5 h6 8.Bh4 g5 9.Bg3 Bg7 10.Qd2 [10.Be2 h5 11.Bxg4 hxg4] 10...Nc6 11.Nb3 Nge5 12.f3 b5 13.Bf2 Rb8 14.Nd4 [14.Nd5; 14.0-0-0?! Nc4 15.Bxc4 bxc4 16.Nd4 Qb6 17.Na4 Qb7 18.Qc3 Bd7µ] ![]() 14...b4! [14...Bd7 15.Be2 Nc4 16.Bxc4 bxc4 17.Rb1² Anand,V-Kasparov,G/Linares 1998] 15.Nd1?!N [15.Nce2 A) 15...Nc4 A1) 16.Nxc6 Qc7 17.Qd5 Be6 18.Qd3 Nxb2 19.Qxa6 Bc4 20.Qa7 Rb7 21.Qa8+ (21.Qa5) 21...Kd7 22.Qa5 Qxc6; A2) 16.Qc1 16...Qc7 17.Rb1; B) 15...Na5 16.Ng3 (16.b3!?) 16...Nec4 17.Bxc4 Nxc4ƒ 0-1 Ortiz,N-Dzagnidze,N/Oropesa del Mar 1998 (28)] 15...Nxd4 16.Bxd4 d5!ƒ 17.exd5 [17.Bxe5 Bxe5 18.exd5 A) 18...Qc7 19.g3 Bb7 (19...e6 20.dxe6 Bxe6 21.Bxa6 0-0©) ; B) 18...Qd6 19.Ne3 (19.g3 h5©) 19...Bxh2 (19...Bxb2 20.Nc4 Qf6 21.Nxb2 Qxb2 22.Kf2÷) 20.0-0-0 (20.Nc4 Bg3+ 21.Kd1 Qc5µ) 20...Bf4µ; 17.Ba7!?] 17...Qxd5 18.c3 0-0 19.Be2 [19.h4 g4 20.Ne3 Qe6µ] 19...Rd8 20.Qe3 Bb7 21.Nf2 [21.h4!? bxc3 22.bxc3 g4 23.Rg1³] 21...bxc3 22.Bxc3 [22.bxc3 Nc4 23.Bxc4 Qxc4 24.Bxg7 Kxg7 25.h4 Rd6!] |
22...Qe6!µ 23.Kf1 Bd5 24.b3 Rbc8 25.Rd1 Rxc3! 26.Qxc3 Ng4 27.Qa5 Ne3+ [27...Ne3+ 28.Kg1 Nxd1 29.Qxd8+ Kh7! (29...Bf8 30.Ne4) 30.Kf1 (30.Bd3+ f5µ) ] 28.Kg1
28...Rc8 [28...Nxd1! 29.Qxd8+ Kh7! (29...Bf8 30.Ne4) A) 30.Bd3+ f5 31.Bxf5+ (31.Kf1 Nxf2 32.Kxf2 Bd4+-+) 31...Qxf5 32.Qxe7 (32.Nxd1 Qd3-+) 32...Nxf2 (32...Qb1!) 33.Kxf2 Qc2+ 34.Kg3 Qxa2µ; B) 30.Ne4 Bd4+ 31.Kf1 Ne3+ 32.Ke1 Nxg2+ 33.Kd2 f5-+; C) 30.Kf1 C1) 30...Ne3+ 31.Kg1 Bd4 32.Qa5 Ng4 (32...Nxg2 33.Kxg2 Qxe2 34.Qxd5 Qxf2+ 35.Kh3÷) 33.Qd2 Bxf2+ 34.Kf1÷; C2) 30...Nxf2 31.Kxf2 Bd4+ 32.Ke1 Bb6! 33.Qb8 (33.Qf8 Qe5 34.Qc8 Ba5+ 35.Kd1 Qd4+ 36.Kc2 Qd2+ 37.Kb1 Qxe2-+; 33.Qe8 Bc6-+) 33...Qf6 34.Bd3+ Kg7-+] 29.Qxa6 Nxd1 30.Qxe6 Bxe6 31.Bxd1 Rc1 [31...Rc1 32.h4 Bd4 33.Kf1 Ra1]0-1 |